Friday, 9 October 2015

Social media platforms as educational interfaces - considering the way forward for blended learning

Social media platforms as educational interfaces - considering the way forward for blended learning

Kelly Louise Preece


Despite their pervasiveness, Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) are subject to a number of criticisms of their efficacy as platforms for blended learning (Weller, 2006). This paper considers the use of social media platform Padlet as an alternative educational interface through evaluation of an intervention-based case-study. Focus groups were conducted with the student cohort, identifying a number of recurring themes that form the main body of this paper: visuality and clarity of the interface, autonomy over learning, students as co-producers and critical reflection. These themes address the intervention itself, and acknowledge the limitations of the research by proposing potential developments. The paper concludes by drawing together questions for further research, and notably reflects on whether it is more pertinent to address the way we use educational interfaces, rather than the interfaces themselves, in considering ‘the way forward’ for blended learning in Higher Education 2018.


Blended Learning; Student Experience

Full Text:



Bean, M. (2014) ‘Keynote’. Keynote Speech presented at the Student Education Conference 3: Engaging Leeds. (3rd. University of Leeds, UK, Jan 10, 2014).
Berg, S. (1999) The Sense of the Past. In Fraleigh, S. and Hanstein, P. (eds) Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Enquiry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsbugh Press.
Birkenhead, J. and Stevens, J. (2002) ‘The Performance Reflective Practice Project: Reflection & Professional Practice’. Paper presented at the Shared Visions Conference. (Brighton, UK, September 1-3, 2002).
Brown, S. (2010) ‘From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching’. Interactive Learning Environments, 18 (1): 1-10.
Bullen, M., Morgan. T. and Qayyum, A. (2011) ‘Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is Not the Issue’. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37 (1): 1-24.
Davis III, C. H. F., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C. and Sacramento Gonzalez Canche, M. (2012) Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Research Directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University.
Finlayson, C. (2014) ‘Using focus groups to enhance student voice: a work-in-progress exploration of student learning experiences in large classes’. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education, 6 (1): 49-54.
Freeman Herreid, C. and Schiller, N. (2013) ‘Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom’. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42 (5): 62-66.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (2008) Understanding Student Learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (eds) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Garrison, D. and Kaunka, H. (2004) ‘Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education’. Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2): 95-105.
Helsper, E. J. and Enyon, R. (2010) ‘Digital natives: where is the evidence?’. British Educational Research Journal, 36 (3): 503-520.
JISC. (2015) Use of VLEs with digital media. Available at: (accessed 24/3/15).
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S. and Healing, G. (2010) ‘Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?’. Computers & Education, 54 (3): 722-732.
Kirk, C. and Pitches, J. (2013) ‘Digital reflection: using digital technologies to enhance and embed creative processes’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22 (2): 213-230.
Kitzinger, J. (2005) Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. In Holloway, I. (ed) Qualitative Research in Health Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Liamputtong, P. (2011) Focus Group Methodology London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Leijen, A., Admiraal, W., Wildschut, L. and Simons, R. (2008) ‘Students’ perspectives on e-learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in dance education’. Research in Dance Education, 9 (2): 147-162.
McCulloch, A. (2009) ‘The student as co-producer: learning from public administration about the student-university relationship’. Studies in Higher Education, 34 (2): 171-183.
O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available at: (accessed 25/3/15).
Padlet (2015) Welcome to Padlet. Available at: (accessed 24/3/15).
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G and Francis, R. (2006) The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. Available at: (accessed 19/8/15).
Türker, M.A. and Zingel, S. (2008) Formative Interfaces for Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning in PLEs. elearningpapers. Available at: (accessed 19/8/15).
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntingdon, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., Withey, R., Iamali, H. R., Dobrowolski, T. and Tenpoir, C. (2008) The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60 (4): 290-310.
Weller, M. (2006) VLE 2.0 and future directions in learning environments. Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning Available at: (accessed 24/3/15).


The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at:

No comments:

Post a Comment